🚀 Founding customers run their next show free — limited to a small founding group.Apply for free access →
Neither of these is our product

OpenWater vs Submittable

OpenWater publishes a price estimator — from $2,700 a year (1–150 applications), or $6,650 a year for one program plus $2,400 a year per supported admin seat (checked 11 Oct 2026) — while Submittable's pricing page lists no prices and sends visitors to book a meeting or talk to sales.

OpenWater
Price published

Starting price
From $2,700/yr (1–150 applications) · $9,050/yr main plan (1 program $6,650/yr + 1 supported admin seat $2,400/yr) · optional implementation $205/hour
Per-entry or per-vote fee
None listed on its pricing page
Best suited to

A buyer who wants a published number before a call.

OpenWater

Submittable
Price not published

Starting price
Pricing not published
Per-entry or per-vote fee
Not published
Best suited to

A buyer willing to book a sales meeting and compare the terms in writing.

Submittable

Where each one is strongest

OpenWater

  • You already run programmes on OpenWater and the migration cost outweighs any saving — we have not verified its feature set beyond its public site.
  • Your procurement team needs a vendor reference at your size and we cannot yet provide one.

Submittable

  • You run a grant or corporate social responsibility programme — Submittable's pricing page lists a Grant & Application Management product and a Corporate Social Responsibility platform; Aclamos is built for awards.
  • You need an enterprise contract with a sales-led onboarding process.

These are the same points we make on each product’s own comparison page, unchanged. Competitor details checked on 11 Oct 2026 against OpenWater’s and Submittable’s own sites; where a vendor does not publish something, we say so rather than guess.

If you are still shortlisting

Aclamos is ours, so treat this paragraph accordingly. It publishes every price, charges a 0% platform fee today, and each of our comparison pages says plainly where the other product is the better choice — including the two above. If your RFP turns on named references, ask us what we can supply.