🚀 Founding customers run their next show free — limited to a small founding group.Apply for free access →
Neither of these is our product

Evalato vs Zealous

Evalato is a flat euro fee per programme (from €2,500, 12 months); Zealous is monthly by submission volume plus a commission on paid submissions, with the first 20 submissions free.

Evalato
Price published

Starting price
Per programme, billed once at go-live, 12 months: €2,500 (up to 50 entries) · €3,500 (100) · €4,500 (200) · Pro €5,500 (up to 10,000) · Enterprise by quote
Per-entry or per-vote fee
None listed on its pricing page
Best suited to

A programme that wants its cost fixed in advance per programme.

Evalato

Zealous
Price not published

Starting price
First 20 submissions free · monthly plans by submission volume (amounts not read)
Per-entry or per-vote fee
2.2% + 20p per paid submission, capped at £2 (from 1 April 2026)
Best suited to

A programme with uncertain or low volume that would rather pay monthly in proportion to it.

Zealous

Where each one is strongest

Evalato

  • You run one programme a year and want a single fee fixed in advance — Evalato bills once on going live for 12 months.
  • You need a Pro programme of up to 10,000 entries at one published price — Evalato lists €5,500.
  • You want to be billed in euros.

Zealous

  • You want monthly billing with no annual contract and a free first 20 submissions — Zealous states both. Aclamos Solo is $79/mo after a 14-day trial.
  • You run many programmes — Zealous states plans are based on submission volume, not the number of programmes.

These are the same points we make on each product’s own comparison page, unchanged. Competitor details checked on 5 Oct 2026 against Evalato’s and Zealous’s own sites; where a vendor does not publish something, we say so rather than guess.

If you are still shortlisting

Aclamos is ours, so treat this paragraph accordingly. It publishes every price, charges a 0% platform fee today, and each of our comparison pages says plainly where the other product is the better choice — including the two above. If your RFP turns on named references, ask us what we can supply.