ElectionBuddy vs OpaVote
OpaVote prices in steps — $10 for 125 voters, $80 for 1,000 — while ElectionBuddy lists $99 for 1,000 voters (ElectionVote) or $397 for 350 (MeetingVote). Both list STV among their voting methods.
ElectionBuddyPrice published
An organisation that wants a choice between election and meeting-vote products with published tiers.
OpaVotePrice published
A group that wants the lowest listed price per voter and a long list of counting methods.
Where each one is strongest
ElectionBuddy
- Price matters most — ElectionBuddy lists ElectionVote at $99 for up to 1,000 voters; Ballotis Standard is $149 for up to 1,000 voters.
- You need counting methods Ballotis does not create, such as STV or cumulative voting — ElectionBuddy lists both.
- Your electorate is above 5,000 — ElectionBuddy lists ElectionVote from $299 up to 100,000 voters; Ballotis publishes up to 5,000 and quotes larger.
OpaVote
- You need Borda, Condorcet or STV counts — OpaVote lists them; Ballotis does not create them.
- You need weighted voting — OpaVote lists it.
- You are running a small vote and price decides: OpaVote lists $10 for 125 voters and $80 for 1,000; Ballotis lists $49 for 250 and $149 for 1,000.
These are the same points we make on each product’s own comparison page, unchanged. Competitor details checked on 5 Oct 2026 against ElectionBuddy’s and OpaVote’s own sites; where a vendor does not publish something, we say so rather than guess.
If you are still shortlisting
Ballotis is ours, so treat this paragraph accordingly. It publishes every price, charges a 0% platform fee today, and each of our comparison pages says plainly where the other product is the better choice — including the two above. If your RFP turns on named references, ask us what we can supply.